By Alexander Winifred
I write this in response to a commentary that appeared today in The Independent Singapore.
In a world where the truth is increasingly the exception rather than the norm, the press has a responsibility to stick to their role and report the facts. Even commentary pieces by unidentified characters should be scrubbed by qualified editors and fact-checkers.
There are some major issues with this so-called opinion piece, which first implicates Anwar in the PKR video scandal(!), and then devolves into a critique of Anwar’s handling of the Bumiputra rights and privileges issue.
1. How do we know it is Anwar who was the mastermind behind the video? And if it was, why wasn’t Anwar named by the police boss?
2. Did the non-Malay Malaysians who voted for Pakatan Harapan in the last election vote for Tun Dr Mahathir to be PM of Malaysia? Many believe they voted for Anwar. They surely did not vote for Azmin. Pakatan Rakyat’s supporters have rallied for a coalition led by Anwar for years. They did not rally for Azmin. We have to face the facts here.
3. The Islamic and Malay agenda and restoration of Bumiputra rights and privileges is actually championed by Mahathir’s party, PPBM. Not by PKR, although Azmin has a role to play as Economic Affairs Minister. I have not seen a single communique from PKR about Reformasi being about restoring Bumiputra rights and privileges. We all understand that within the alliance, it is PPBM that has held that responsibility as a mainly Malay party.
4. “Harapan came on the back of a manifesto that assured the electorate the repeal of harsh, draconian and state-enforced religious observation.” Reformasi, says the unknown writer, “is now a cry for change from corruption to integrity, from racist and bigoted policies to one that gives everyone a fair go at life.” I do not recall such statements in the manifesto.
Just to be sure, I double checked again. The manifesto said: “We reiterate our pledge as stated in the Pakatan Harapan Promise (9
January 2016) that we will: